Authors:
Frank Stephan* and
Thomas Zeugmann**
Source: Algorithmic Learning Theory,
10th International Conference, ALT'99, Tokyo, Japan, December 1999,
Proceedings,
(Osamu Watanabe and Takashi Yokomori, Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial
Intelligence 1720, pp. 276 - 290, Springer-Verlag 1999.
Abstract.
Blum and Blum (1975) showed that a class
of suitable recursive
approximations to the halting problem is reliably EX-learnable.
These investigations are carried on by showing that
is neither
in NUM nor robustly EX-learnable. Since the definition of
the class is quite natural and does not contain any
self-referential coding, serves as an example that the notion of
robustness for learning is quite more restrictive than intended.
Moreover,
variants of this problem obtained by approximating any given
recursively enumerable set A instead of the halting
problem K are
studied. All corresponding function classes
are still
EX-inferable but may fail to be
reliably EX-learnable, for example if A is non-high and
hypersimple.
Additionally, it is proved that
is neither in NUM nor robustly EX-learnable
provided A is part of a recursively
inseparable pair, A is simple but not hypersimple
or A is neither recursive nor high.
These results provide more evidence
that there is still some need to find an adequate notion for
``naturally learnable function classes.''
*Supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Research Grant no. Am 60/9-2.
**Supported by the
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Fundamental Areas from the
Japanese Ministry of Education,
Science, Sports, and Culture under grant no. 10558047.
Part of this work was done while visiting the
Laboratoire d'Informatique Algorithmique: Fondements et
Applications, Université Paris 7. This author is gratefully
indebted to Maurice Nivat for providing financial support
and inspiring working conditions.
©Copyright 1999, Springer-Verlag.
|